Hebrew
Video Interviews
Rabbis
Board of Directors
Register
Issues
Articles
Lectures
Press
Donate Money
Donate Organs
Volunteering
Documents
Links
Donors & Recipients
Contact Us
Charts

1. Is it a Mitzva?
2. Brain-Stem Death
3. Superstitions
4. Israel
5. To donate or not?
6. Donating to non-Jews

Is Organ Donation a Mitzva?
As with most Halachic questions, it depends on who you ask. This website is not meant to give a Halachic ruling on organ donation, but rather to inform the public as to some of the different medical issues and some of the general trends of rabbinic rulings involved with organ donation.

All rabbis agree that pikuach nefesh, saving a life, is of primary importance and overrides all other Halachic considerations except for murder, illicit sexual relations and idolatry.

  • "Don’t stand idly by the blood of your neighbor!" Rashi, the famous bible commentator, explains this to mean "don’t watch him die when you can save him." The Choshen Mishpat elaborates that "even if there is a danger to your life in saving the other person, you should not be overly concerned with your own safety." [Leviticus 19:16] This commandment indicates that it is appropriate to save another life by donating organs.

There are biblical commandments, however, concerning the handling of a cadaver that might indicate that organ donation should be forbidden. But pikuach nefesh, saving a life, supercedes them. They are:

  • Nivul Hamet is a biblical prohibition that forbids the needless mutilation of a cadaver. This prohibition is the basis why autopsies are generally forbidden. But Rabbis do permit autopsies when they are needed to determine the cause of death, where the results might save lives. Therefore, all Rabbis agree that saving lives, pikuach nefesh, is more important than the prohibition of Nivul Hamet. Organ transplants save lives.

  • Halanat Hamet is a biblical prohibition that forbids delaying the burial of a body. All Rabbis agree that Pikuach Nefesh, saving lives, is more important than this prohibition. Organ transplants save lives. [Deuteronomy 21:23]

  • Hana’at Hamet is a prohibition, some say biblical others say rabbinical, that forbids one from getting any benefit from a dead body, such as selling it for medical research. All Rabbis agree that Pikuach Nefesh, saving a life, is more important than this prohibition. Organ transplants save lives.

The above prohibitions afford respect and dignity to cadavers, for they once hosted life itself. In this context, it makes sense that all Rabbis agree that saving a life outweighs observing prohibitions concerning a cadaver.

 


Brain-Stem Death
Most Rabbis who don’t support organ donation, do so on the basis that the organs are mainly taken from a brain-stem dead person who is, in their opinion, halachickly alive. Organ donation would be forbidden because taking essential organs from a live person is, in effect, killing them.

Medical Description: A person who suffers a sever head trauma, and whose brain-stem does not function, cannot breath on his own. Brain-stem death is irreversible, and within 10 minutes the heart will stop pumping because it is deprived of oxygen. With the invention of the respirator, however, it became possible to artificially keep blood oxygenated thus allowing the heart and other organs to continue functioning.

From the onset of brain-death, however, the brain begins to liquefy and as a result, even on a respiratory, all organs and systems shut down in a matter of days. Concerning the legal and medical status of brain-stem death: the majority of the countries in the world, and 44 US States, accept the 1968 Harvard Criteria of Brain-stem death as the definitive moment of death.

Halachic Status: The central Halachic question is whether or not Jewish law considers a brain-stem dead person, whose heart continues to beat only as result of the artificial help of a respirator, dead or alive. If Halacha considers this person to be ‘alive’ then removal of organs would be forbidden because you would be ‘killing’ the donor.

Breathing VS Beating
There is a Rabbinic debate in the Talmud concerning the definition of death. One opinion is that death is indicated by the irreversible cessation of breathing. The other opinion is that death is indicated by the irreversible cessation of the heart beat. [Tractate Yuma, page 85, side A.]

  • BREATHING
    There are two methods to determine if cessation of breathing is irreversible. If after attempting CPR and all other life saving measures, breathing is not observed for a period of time it is considered irreversible. In addition, modern medicine has established that the brain-stem controls respiration, and if the brain-stem is not functioning, it dies, and a person can never breathe again on his own. Never in the history of modern medicine has there ever been a case of a brain-stem dead person ‘waking up.’ [Parenthetically, people can wake up from a coma because comatose people have a functioning brain stem and are breathing on their own.]

  • BEATING
    There are those Rabbinic authorities who claim that only when a person’s heart has irreversibly stopped beating is he dead. On a practical level, this makes it difficult to transplant organs because once the heart stops sending oxygenated blood to other organs they begin to deteriorate and shut down. The organs then are no longer viable transplants.

    What most people don’t know, however, is that in certain situations it is possible for a non-heart beating donor to donate kidney and cornea for up to 40 minutes after cessation of heart beat. [Kidney and cornea are more resilient to oxygen deprivation then other organs.] The ramifications are enormous because out of 80,000 Americans waiting for organs, 50,000 are waiting for kidneys.

In a nutshell this is the main Halachic debate concerning organ donation. For more information please see the Resources link on this website. For deciding what to do concerning organ donation please see the ‘To Donate or Not’ link on this website.


Superstitions

  • The Evil Eye: Some people believe that signing a donor card will invite ‘the evil eye’ and cause the card holder to have a deadly accident. Besides this belief being totally irrational and unproven it is, in fact, disproven: there are millions of donor card holders worldwide and nothing has happened to them. Indeed, if that were the case there would be an adequate supply of organs and no need for organ donor education.

  • Resurrection of the Dead: Some people believe that organs should be kept in the cadaver because they are necessary in order to be resurrected from the dead. This is pure fantasy because immediately upon death, organs begin to rapidly disintegrate and after a few weeks have dissolved. Indeed, even if one were to believe that resurrection is dependent on the bodily state of the cadaver, the only Jewish source which mentions such a thing refers to luz bone, a vertebrate of the spine, as the point from where resurrection stems from. In addition, if the Almighty Lord decides to resurrect a dead person, he assuredly will have the power to supply missing parts. It is difficult to imagine that the many Israeli soldiers who died defending the State of Israel and the people of Israel might not be resurrected because he lost an organ in battle.

  • Health Care Abuse: Some people believe that if doctors know you have a donor card they will prematurely declare you dead before you really are dead in order to get your organs. First, it is difficult to imagine that a doctor in good conscience would kill one patient in order to save another. Such action is unethical and illegal, exposing the physician and the hospital to criminal and civil liability. Second, most hospitals have established protocol that demands a separate medical team – a team that was not taking care of the patient and is unaware that the patient is a potential donor – to determine if the patient is brain-stem dead or not.

  • Corneas Do Not Save Lives: Rabbi Unterman, one of the Chief Rabbis of Israel, Rabbi Tuvia Friedman, and Rabbinic authorities consider blindness to be a life threatening illness, where one’s surrounding are dangerous and may possibly causes death. They have ruled that donating corneas to give a person sight is halachickly ‘saving a life.’


Israel
Although the Chief Rabbinate of Israel ruled that brain-death fits the definition of Halachic death, there remains a widespread misperception in Israel that Jewish law categorically prohibits organ donation. As a result, Jews have the lowest percentage, among all other ethnic groups worldwide, of signing organ-donor cards. So while most western countries achieve organ-donor membership of up to 30% of their population, Israel – a predominately Jewish country – remains at 3%. Israel was recently expelled from the European Union Organ Donor Network because, year after year, they accepted organs but didn’t donate organs. Even though most Israelis are secular, when it comes to issues of death they adopt a more ‘religious’ perspective and don’t donate organs.

Death in Israel due to a dearth of organs is unnecessary. In 2001, there were 200 people in Israel who died in such a way that made them viable donors. None of these brain-stem dead patients had signed donor cards but all their families were approached by transplant coordinators and asked to donate organs. 70 families, out of 200, agreed to donate. [This 35% acceptance rate is also the lowest in the world.] That means that 130 people were buried with perfectly good organs to donate. The tragedy is that in that same year, 114 Israelis died waiting for organs that never came. The 130 viable donors could have easily donated their organs to the 114 people but didn’t. 114 people died unnecessarily.

Other Issues
Gossess: Gossess is a Halachic category ascribed to a person who is deathly ill, and who will most likely die in three days. Halacha dictates that a Gosses must not be touched for fear that any sudden or traumatic movement will accelerate the person’s death. According to some Rabbis, such as Rabbi Moshe Tendler, it is medically possible to check a person for brain-stem death without causing invasive or traumatic injury that might accelerate death and violate the prohibition of gosses.


To Donate or not?
If a person is unclear how to act, he or she should consult with a knowledgeable Rabbi who has medical knowledge. But confusion or the effort involved in asking a Rabbi should not become paralysis or procrastination.


Donating to non-Jews
"Are Jews allowed to donate organs to save non-Jews?"
Before answering this question it is important for the person asking the question to clarify for him or herself if this questioned is being asked out of Halachic concern or rather based on nationalistic reasons (“All Arabs are our enemy”), or based on simple racism. If the questions stems from non-halachic forces, then he or she should not hide behind the skirt of halacha by claiming that halacha prohibits organ donation to non Jews. “Do not use the Torah as a spade to dig with.”

1. Image of God
The above question presupposes that the Torah indicates that while saving the life of a Jew would be permitted, the same act to save a non-Jew would be forbidden. In other words, the Torah considers the life of a non-Jew to be less valuable than that of a Jew. This assumption could be challenged on the Torah basis that “all of mankind was created in the image of God.” Since Judaism believes that every human being is created in the image of God, donating an organ to a non-Jew is affirming that the person has the potential to walk in the path of God just as Abram, the father of Judaism, was not Jewish before he became Abraham.

2. Different Halachic definition of non-Jew
It is true, that in certain cases the Talmud distinguishes between Jew and non-Jew concerning the permissibility of violating commandments to save a life. Some Rabbis, however, believe that although the halacha of 2000 years ago would distinguish between Jew and non-Jew that is because the non-Jew of yesteryear was a pagan, that sacrificed their children to the fire god, Molech. The non-Jew of today, certainly not monotheistic non-Jews, would not fall into such a category.  

Even if one were to accept today the ancient Halachic distinction between Jew and non-Jew, it appears that there are a number of other Halachic factors that compel a Jew to donate organs to a non-Jew, see below.

3. Enmity (Eiva) – The Talmud states that although one might think it is forbidden to violate the laws of the Torah, such as Sabbath laws, to save the life of a non-Jew, we are supposed to do so out of fear that by not doing so it might cause enmity between non-Jews and Jews. That reasoning seems to apply here.

Rav Moshe wrote in Iggrot Moshe that Jewish doctors should violate the Sabbath to save the life of a non-Jew because of enmity. In fact, one of the things that inflamed the Crown Heights riots started in 1991 was the fact that the Jewish ambulance corp., Hazalah, took the Jewish driver to the hospital and not the black child. Rioting ensued for 3 days and 3 nights where Jews were chased and beaten and the Chasid was killed. Enmity is a real concern in our day.

There is plenty of anecdotal evidence in transplant centers how the medical establishment is angry that Jews don’t donate organs but are willing to receive organs. Imagine how much more angry the non-Jews would become if they were told that Jews will donate organs only to Jews but not to non-Jews. 

4. The organ recipient might be a Jew – (This reason assumes one should make a distinction between pagan and Jew). According to US and Israeli law a donor family is prevented from knowing the religion of a potential recipient. As a result, there is a chance that the recipient might be a Jew. The Talmud, tractate, Yoma, clearly states that when it comes to saving lives we don’t go after the majority.

Meaning that even if the majority of the 85,000 Americans waiting for organs are non-Jews, we don’t assume a chazaka that the recipient is a non-Jew. Even if there is a fraction of one percent of a chance that you can save a (Jewish) life, you should violate 610 laws of the Torah (out of 613). 

5. Organ donation bumps a Jews closer to the top of the list. – Even if all of your 8 critical organs were given to a non-Jew, by removing those recipients off the list you are directly causing a Jewish person on the list to be moved closer to the top where they have a better chance of being selected to receive organs.

Nationalistic Perspective
The question of donating organs to non-Jews often comes up in Israel where potential recipients are Israeli Arabs and they are viewed by some Israelis as ‘the enemy.’ (It should be noted that Israel is not responsible for organ donations to Palestinians. Israeli organs only go to Israeli citizens, whether they are Jews, Muslims or Christians.)

  • Arab Donors – Many Arabs donate organs that save Jewish lives. If discrimination were allowed – it would go both ways.
     
  • Suicide Bombers - An Arab who can’t get an organ and has a limited time to live, is the best candidate to be recruited to become a suicide bomber. He has nothing to lose.
     
  • Justice - Consider God’s response to the angel in the story of Yishmael. (Breshit, Vayere) Rashi comments that the angels asked God to let the boy Yishmael die of thirst in the desert because his offspring will kill Jews in the future. Rashi quotes the Talmud (Rosh Hashana 16b) and says that the boy needs to be judged for whom he is now, and not what he, or his descendents, will do in the future.
     
  • Goodwill – There can be no better way to build bridges between Arabs and Jews than by having reciprocal life-saving organ donation.